X-Digest-Num: 71
Message-ID: <44114.71.415.959273824@eGroups.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:56:18 +0800
From: Lin Zhemin <ljm@ljm.qqjane.net>
Subject: Re: How do we translate Dao?
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 415
Content-Length: 726
Lines: 24

Mon, 22 Feb 1999, la xod(xod@bway.net) cusku di'e
> Why not refer to the Dao as "la'e zo dao"? This preserves a level of
> vagueness which makes it all the more absurd should someone attempt to
> exclusively dictate its meaning and nature.

Good idea.. But IIRC, "la'e zo dao" means "that is called Dao", w/o the
element of "I". 

> animals, etc) got their own gismu, while the rest will have to suffer with
> fu'ivla and lujvo?

I've no idea. But when I've seen the gismu {zinki}, I was curious about
other chemical elements, e.g., pluto ? 


-- 

.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.	==> 請支持邏輯語言。
co'o mi'e lindjy,min.		==> 再見，我是林哲民。
Fingerprint20 = CE32 D237 02C0 FE31 FEA9  B858 DE8F AE2D D810 F2D9