X-Digest-Num: 123
Message-ID: <44114.123.704.959273824@eGroups.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 08:50:03 -0300
From: "=?us-ascii?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@intermedia.com.ar>
Subject: Re: mut
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 704
Content-Length: 1161
Lines: 37

la lojbab cusku di'e

>There having been a formal decision by the LLG board that "Lojban is
>Loglan", the correct word for "loglandic" is of course "lojbo".  

That is the officially correct word, but I doubt people will
use it that way, because it is too confusing (as well as provocative,
which is the least we want to do in a context of rapprochement). 
I prefer to use loglo, which probably everyone will understand even 
before it makes it into the dictionary. I'm not sure what the status
of five-letter fuhivla is, but I have already incorporated loglo, spero 
and xorvo to my lexicon.

>We can
>make a lujvo from dzena-lojbo for the ancestral language culture, to which
>one can prefix mal- if one sees fit zo'o.  

This sounds right (I mean dzena, not mal- :) but I would rather make
it jbodze: dzena be le lojbo. 

>To refer to the other
>organization and its version of the language as distinct from our
>predecessors, the most accurate would be "me la TLIn prenu".


And how would you refer to a Lojbanist as distinct form a 
generic Loglanist? "me la lojbangirz prenu"? I think I will stick 
to lojbo and loglo.

co'o mi'e xorxes