X-Digest-Num: 227
Message-ID: <44114.227.1248.959273825@eGroups.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:47:00 +0100
From: A Rosta <a.rosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Anselmisms and gadro
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 1248
Content-Length: 697
Lines: 25

> >I think that's only one use of {ko'a}; that is, not all {ko'a}s need
be
> >bound in a goi phrase. They're very much like English
it/him/her/them.
>
> Huh!  That's news to me.  Either I missed that ruling/development, or
brain
> cells in charge of remembering it have been lax.
>
> ~mark

AFA-the-little-IK, I'm the only one to have used {ko'a} without it being
overtly
bound,so I don't think you've forgotten anything, but the description of
{ko'a}
that I gave is, I believe (& most others seem to agree), consistent with
the letter
& spirit of the Woldy Codex. I imagine it was Jorge who first realized
this.

 --And. [I mean The Refgram, of course. - by the "codex", that is.]