X-Digest-Num: 309 Message-ID: <44114.309.1701.959273825@eGroups.com> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 20:40:11 EST From: Pycyn@aol.com Subject: Re: More about questions and the like (was:What I have for dinner...") X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 1701 Content-Length: 2021 Lines: 41 << I think at one point that we decided that intentional descriptions and names are from the point of view of the speaker (bearing in mind the listener), so that if I use "la djan" in a sentence, the only thing that matters is whether I and the listener know who John is, not whether le djuno uses that name (or description) as part of lenu le djuno cu djuno.>> I wonder if we could have decided that and then could make it stick for lo se djuno. In a lot of cases, it is clearly important what concept/name is involved in the clause: John knows that the number of planets is larger than seven has to be about the number of planets, not some other name of nine (especially since John may not know it is nine) . If John thinks that the number of planets is eleven and knows that the number of players on a football team (which he has right) is larger than seven, that will not count as his knowing that the number of planets is larger than seven. Similarly, if John knows Paul under some wrongheaded description but knows that the person he knows under that description went to the party, that may well count for knowing that Paul went to the party. My and your concepts don't seem to count in any consistent way. <> Yes, that is, both: solving the probolem by kicking it into an imaginary world not otherwise stated. << I'm not sure how any of this ties into performatives, or whether we need to start seeking boxes again zo'o.>> Performatives are just a way of getting in the intensional contexts that "seek" already provides for the boxes, but that are not apparent for loose talk about Pegasus and unicorns. pc