From sentto-44114-1841-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Wed Jan 26 10:16:52 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 1294 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2000 10:16:51 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2000 10:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 9742 invoked by uid 40001); 26 Jan 2000 10:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 9739 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2000 10:18:08 -0000 Received: from fl.egroups.com (208.48.218.18) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2000 10:18:08 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-1841-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.39] by fl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 26 Jan 2000 10:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17854 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2000 10:18:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 26 Jan 2000 10:18:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo21.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.65) by 10.1.10.27 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2000 10:18:06 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.6.) id h.da.1244921 (4318) for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 05:17:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: lojban@onelist.com X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 05:17:58 EST From: Pycyn@aol.com Subject: Fwd: [lojban] Subjunctive? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_da.1244921.25c023d6_boundary" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --part1_da.1244921.25c023d6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 1/23/00 6:45:53 AM CST, C.D.Wright@solipsys.compulink.co.uk writes: << From: Pycyn@aol.com > The English (Latin, ...) subjunctives do a number of > things, which are sorted out in Lojban to a number of > cmavo. So, decide what you want to say and pick the > appropriate device for doing it. I feel that I have a good grasp of the majority of the grammar, but my vocabulary is only expanding slowly. As a result, I can't find a way of saying: If I had a million pounds/dollars/kroner then I'd be rich. I guess what I want to say is: Regardless of the truth value of A, (A => B) is a valid assertion. Where: A = ( I have a million million pounds ) and : B = ( mi ricfu ) Yes? -- \\// ze'uku ko jmive gi'e snada>> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com --part1_da.1244921.25c023d6_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from rly-yg05.mx.aol.com (rly-yg05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.5]) by air-yg05.mail.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 07:45:53 -0500 Received: from nickel.cix.co.uk (nickel.compulink.co.uk [194.153.0.18]) by rly-yg05.mx.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 07:45:46 -0500 Received: from solipsys.compulink.co.uk (solipsys.compulink.co.uk [194.153.10.165]) by nickel.cix.co.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA17449 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 12:45:42 GMT X-Envelope-From: C.D.Wright@solipsys.compulink.co.uk Message-Id: <200001231245.MAA17449@nickel.cix.co.uk> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: C.D.Wright@solipsys.compulink.co.uk To: Pycyn@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 12:46:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [lojban] Subjunctive? Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.31) From: Pycyn@aol.com > The English (Latin, ...) subjunctives do a number of > things, which are sorted out in Lojban to a number of > cmavo. So, decide what you want to say and pick the > appropriate device for doing it. I feel that I have a good grasp of the majority of the grammar, but my vocabulary is only expanding slowly. As a result, I can't find a way of saying: If I had a million pounds/dollars/kroner then I'd be rich. I guess what I want to say is: Regardless of the truth value of A, (A => B) is a valid assertion. Where: A = ( I have a million million pounds ) and : B = ( mi ricfu ) Yes? -- \\// ze'uku ko jmive gi'e snada --part1_da.1244921.25c023d6_boundary--