From sentto-44114-1871-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Jan 29 19:01:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 5751 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2000 19:01:24 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2000 19:01:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5687 invoked by uid 40001); 29 Jan 2000 19:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 5684 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2000 19:02:54 -0000 Received: from fj.egroups.com (208.48.218.16) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2000 19:02:54 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-1871-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.39] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 29 Jan 2000 19:02:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 16739 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2000 19:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 29 Jan 2000 19:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.pemail2.net) (195.92.25.8) by 10.1.10.27 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2000 19:02:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 9021 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2000 19:02:50 -0000 Received: from m453-mp1-cvx1c.lan.ntl.com (HELO andrew) (62.252.173.197) by mailhost.pemail2.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2000 19:02:50 -0000 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:03:42 -0000 From: "And Rosta" Subject: RE: [lojban] Subjunctive? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "And Rosta" C.D. Wright (though Outlook claims it is from Pycyn): > I feel that I have a good grasp of the majority of the > grammar, but my vocabulary is only expanding slowly. > As a result, I can't find a way of saying: > > If I had a million pounds/dollars/kroner > then I'd be rich. > > I guess what I want to say is: > > Regardless of the truth value of A, > (A => B) is a valid assertion. > > Where: A = ( I have a million million pounds ) > and : B = ( mi ricfu ) > > > Yes? Isn't that {gu}? But anyway it doesn't work, does it, because it is truth-conditionally equivalent to just {B or not A}. A B or not A T T T T F F F T T F F F --And. --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Looking for the lowest refinance rate for your mortgage? GetSmart.com can help. We'll help you find the loan you need - quick, easy, and FREE click Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com