From sentto-44114-2001-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri Feb 18 14:26:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 4967 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 14:26:04 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 14:26:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23493 invoked by uid 40001); 18 Feb 2000 14:29:01 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 23490 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 14:29:00 -0000 Received: from fj.egroups.com (208.48.218.16) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 14:29:00 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2001-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.39] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2000 14:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 1703 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 14:28:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 18 Feb 2000 14:28:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.pemail2.net) (195.92.25.8) by 10.1.10.27 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 14:28:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12667 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 14:28:55 -0000 Received: from m183-mp1-cvx1c.lan.ntl.com (HELO andrew) (62.252.172.183) by mailhost.pemail2.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 14:28:55 -0000 To: "Rex F. May" , "John Cowan" Cc: , , Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <38AC2098.117BB6@peakpeak.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:29:47 -0000 From: "And Rosta" Subject: RE: [lojban] Dr. James Cooke Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "And Rosta" Rex May: > Or, maybe better yet, since total relexification seems to > be in the cards, redo the vocabulary a la my suggestion > of many years ago. To summarize: Not to say that your suggestions mightn't be improvements, but please let me make clear that my suggestion, now with a suggested implementation from John Cowan, does NOT put relexification on the cards. Those who know me will know that I would LOVE a redesign, but much more important than this, the majority of the Loglan community/communities would not, and moreover have (at least in the Lojban instance) been solemnly promised that there will not be a redesign (except under certain exceptional and stringently defined circumstances). I very much expect that if reunification of Loglandia were linked to redesign, then it would be vetoed in any referendum. --And. --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Shop the web for great deals. Save on Computers, electronics, Home furnishings and more. Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com