From sentto-44114-2002-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri Feb 18 15:17:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 5052 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 15:17:48 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 15:17:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25499 invoked by uid 40001); 18 Feb 2000 15:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 25496 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 15:20:44 -0000 Received: from fj.egroups.com (208.48.218.16) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 15:20:44 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2002-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.39] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2000 15:20:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 11412 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 15:20:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 18 Feb 2000 15:20:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fb02.eng00.mindspring.net) (207.69.229.20) by mta1.onelist.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 15:20:39 -0000 Received: from [207.69.115.26] (user-37kasoq.dialup.mindspring.com [207.69.115.26]) by fb02.eng00.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21885; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:20:08 -0500 (EST) X-Sender: rmcivor@m3.sprynet.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <200002171027.CAA22319@mailbox1.ucsd.edu> To: "Vjacxeslav' Ivanov'" , "A Rosta" Cc: loglanists@ucsd.edu, logli@ucsd.edu, lojban@onelist.com, a.rosta@pmail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:19:08 -0500 From: "Robert A. McIvor" Subject: Re: RE: Re[2]: [lojban] Dr. James Cooke Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Robert A. McIvor" At 5:26 PM +0300 2/18/00, Vjacxeslav' Ivanov' wrote: >> > From: Vjacxeslav' Ivanov' >.. >> > Yes, uniting WOULD BE... But how is it possible? The only way >> > is to absorbe one community by another, but this way is close, >> > because ekzemple me - I will hardly relearn from the very >> > beginning to Lojban - the same will say most of lojbanists, I >> > think. >> > >> > So, uu, our ways are parallel... >.. >> choosing some appropriate lexical indicator at the start of the text >> one could indicate whether one were writing Loglan in classical or Lojban >> mode. A stage beyond that would be to define word-for-word equivalences >> between the Lojban and classical Loglan lexicons. > >Can such equivalents be found, if the classical and lojban grammars have >differences, as I understand? The idea is rather interesting. For example, >I can start my speeches by smth. like "Hue Slavik ja lentaa la Loglan" :)) >Or we shall invent a "little word" for this... Though in Loglan most >l-initial little words are already "articles". John Cowan has suggested 'hoa' as the Loglan word to introduce Lojban text. It is available, and a reasonable choice, since a similar sounding Lojban word is also available to introduce Loglan text. Sincerely, Robert A. McIvor (rmcivor@mac.com) --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Want to help promote education? Help kids learn to read? AND earn extra income? Join our affiliate program for the successful Hooked on Phonics product and you will do all three. Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com