From sentto-44114-2009-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri Feb 18 20:51:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 5665 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 20:51:47 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 20:51:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 13076 invoked by uid 40001); 18 Feb 2000 20:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 13073 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 20:54:43 -0000 Received: from hm.egroups.com (208.48.218.15) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 20:54:43 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2009-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.39] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2000 20:54:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 17217 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 20:54:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 18 Feb 2000 20:54:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (160.79.75.88) by mta1.onelist.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 20:54:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13946 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:53:54 -0500 (EST) To: Lojban Listserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:53:54 -0500 (EST) From: Invent Yourself Subject: Re: [lojban] rapprochement Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, And Rosta wrote: > From: "And Rosta" > > > >From: Alex Leith > > > > > >I've been pondering a rapprochement between Loglan and Lojban, and Bob > > >McIvor is thinking that way too. > > I do hope that Lojbanistan takes a proactive stance on this, more than > just wishing Loglan good luck. As far as I am aware, there have been > many IAL schisms, but never a reunification, so that would be a shining > first. And the longer it is delayed, the more people will have a vested > interest in there not being a reunification (because they won't want to > do any extra learning). The history of Esperanto vs. Ido, while interesting, is relevant to almost nobody. The context for that statement is that I am interested in the relationship between Lojban and the outside world, and not that between Lojban and the IAL community. Bob promised the sanctity of baseline Lojban, and I refuse to learn even a single cmavo beyond it! Lojban is Loglan. It would be wonderful if the good minds from TLI joined us and applied their years of wisdom to helping us grapple with the advanced topics we have been discussing, such as the subjunctive, etc. ----- When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs. When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because I was innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun. Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say nothing about it. --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Get what you deserve with NextCard Visa. Rates as low as 2.9 percent Intro or 9.9 percent Fixed APR, online balance transfers, Rewards credit you deserve! Apply now! Get your NextCard Visa at Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com