From sentto-44114-2013-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri Feb 18 22:16:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 5799 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 22:16:24 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 22:16:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 17308 invoked by uid 40001); 18 Feb 2000 22:19:22 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 17305 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 22:19:21 -0000 Received: from hi.egroups.com (208.48.218.11) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 22:19:21 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2013-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2000 22:10:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 9019 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 22:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.10.36 with QMQP; 18 Feb 2000 22:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fb04.eng00.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.170) by 10.1.10.27 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 22:10:37 -0000 Received: from [207.69.115.26] (user-37kat1i.dialup.mindspring.com [207.69.116.50]) by fb04.eng00.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA23716; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:10:31 -0500 (EST) X-Sender: rmcivor@m3.sprynet.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: To: Invent Yourself , Lojban Listserver MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:54:00 -0500 From: "Robert A. McIvor" Subject: Re: [lojban] rapprochement Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Robert A. McIvor" At 3:53 PM -0500 2/18/00, Invent Yourself wrote: >From: Invent Yourself > >On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, And Rosta wrote: > >> From: "And Rosta" >> >> > >From: Alex Leith >> > > >> > >I've been pondering a rapprochement between Loglan and Lojban, and Bob >> > >McIvor is thinking that way too. >> >> I do hope that Lojbanistan takes a proactive stance on this, more than >> just wishing Loglan good luck. As far as I am aware, there have been >> many IAL schisms, but never a reunification, so that would be a shining >> first. And the longer it is delayed, the more people will have a vested >> interest in there not being a reunification (because they won't want to >> do any extra learning). > >>Bob promised the sanctity of baseline Lojban, and I refuse to learn even a >>single cmavo beyond it! >Lojban is Loglan. It would be wonderful if the good minds from TLI joined >us and applied their years of wisdom to helping us grapple with the >advanced topics we have been discussing, such as the subjunctive, etc. > Indeed, we had extensive discussions on the subjunctive two or three years ago, and added it to Loglan. However, incorporating it in Lojban would add at least one cmavo, so alas, it would not be suitable for the author. Sincerely, Robert A. McIvor (rmcivor@mac.com) --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Get what you deserve with NextCard Visa. Rates as low as 2.9 percent Intro or 9.9 percent Fixed APR, online balance transfers, Rewards credit you deserve! Apply now! Get your NextCard Visa at Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com