From sentto-44114-2078-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Feb 26 04:12:38 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 18612 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2000 04:12:37 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2000 04:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 27359 invoked by uid 40001); 26 Feb 2000 04:16:06 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 27356 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2000 04:16:05 -0000 Received: from hm.egroups.com (208.48.218.15) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2000 04:16:05 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2078-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.37] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 26 Feb 2000 04:15:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 17121 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2000 04:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 Feb 2000 04:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo17.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.7) by mta1.onelist.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2000 04:15:58 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id h.7a.203b5da (7556) for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:15:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <7a.203b5da.25e8ad7a@aol.com> To: lojban@onelist.com X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 67 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:15:54 EST X-eGroups-From: BestATN@aol.com From: BestATN@aol.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Digest Number 374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: BestATN@aol.com In a message dated 2/25/2000 5:32:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, lojban@onelist.com writes: > > I like at the lujvo that the TLI group is stuck with because of bad > decisions by JCB. TLI has not baselined their language, but (so far as we > know) their lexicon has been frozen in concrete in terms of bad tanru. (Of > course we don't know this, since we don't have the dictionary, but I would > be mildly surprised if "man-do" for "manning a ship" was > changed. Certainly Lognet has never announced any paring or replacement of > bad metaphors.) > they aren't stuck with bad lujvo. anyone can make a new word whenever he wants. getting the current ones out of the dictionary might be a chore though. (BTW, what does " I like at the lujvo " mean? look at them? ) Steven ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WANT FREE MAGAZINES? Sample over 500 magazines in 30 categories-- all for FREE at FreeShop.com, your source for thousands of free and trial offers! http://click.egroups.com/1/1610/1/_/17627/_/951538558/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com