Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 25721 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2000 16:38:52 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2000 16:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14233 invoked by uid 40001); 1 Mar 2000 16:42:33 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 14230 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2000 16:42:32 -0000 Received: from hl.egroups.com (208.48.218.14) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2000 16:42:32 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2109-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 01 Mar 2000 16:42:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 23117 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2000 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Mar 2000 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eeyore.cc.uic.edu) (128.248.171.51) by mta1.onelist.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2000 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from [128.248.250.241] (mac0.uicomp.uic.edu [128.248.250.241]) by eeyore.cc.uic.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27774; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:39:36 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: sbelknap@mailserv.uic.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: To: pycyn@aol.com Cc: lojban@onelist.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:42:12 -0600 X-eGroups-From: Steven Belknap From: Steven Belknap Subject: Re: [lojban] Sets etc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 4499 Lines: 78 From: Steven Belknap In high school geometry class, I was taught the importance of having undefined terms as the basis for the development of mathematics. The four undefined terms I was taught for geometry were line, point, set, and "betweenness" One can not avoid circular definition, which I fear is at the root of the problem pycyn is exploring. >From: pycyn@aol.com > >"Wherefore all this strife there be / 'twixt Tweedle Dumm and Tweedle Dee?" >A class is any collection of things conceived as together. Usually we think >of it as all the things satisfying some formula: is a cow, is a root of >equation..., etc., but in the full horrors of mathematics there are provably >classes for which there is not formula (denumerably many formulae, >non-denumerably many classes). A set is a class satisfying certain further >conditions, amounting to its being able to be a member of other sets (though >not so circularly -- actually recursively -- defined). A mass (in the Lojban >sense) is a class considered in a certain way, additively rather than >collectively or distributively. Almost all Lojban descriptors, LE, are about >classes; they differ in how the properties ascribed to the class are related >to the properties of the individuals that make it up. In the simplest cases, >le and the like, the property of the class is that of some or all of its >members (which is specified by the quantifier, explicit or implicit, used). >For masses, the property is the sum (in some often quite inexplicit, even >metaphorical, sense) of those of the members: the weight of a mass is >literally the sum of the weights of the members, the triumph of the mass is >the result of the combined efforts of the members (even including >some that had a negative impact on that triumph -- the crowd stormed the >Bastille despite some who ran away and some who aided the Ancien Regime), the >performance of the school is some kind of average of the performances of the >students, and so on (you have quite a bit of freedom here, but need to be >able to explain if push comes to shove). And at some point, the whole can >come down to the proeprty of one member, the logical summation of an "or," >and thus collapse back toward the first sort of usage. Finally, a class may >be viewed collectively, and then the properties attributed to it have little >to do with the properties of the individual but rather with matters like how >many there are of them or (more related to their proerties) what toher >classes they belong to -- cardinality, inclusion, and the like -- set >theoretic properties, in short, which only rarely have value in ordinary >discourse. >For the most part, then, the use of the set markers is, like all of MEX, in >the system >because someday we may want to talk mathematics, the most recognizable special >language system within our (and every) language. so far we haven't been >inclined to try that, but we should not be prevented from it for lack in the >language (and, of course, we should not have help up the development of the >language just to get it in -- and Lojban did not hold up....much). >As for JCB's lo -- it was a muddle and everyone -- even JCB -- knew it was a >muddle of half a dozen different ideas floating around in his head. I think >we now have most of them sorted out in Lojban, though we still seem to get >into fights over a few from time to time (and pretty generally, having >forgetten how we solved it the last time, come up with the opposite solution >the next). >pc > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >WANT FREE MAGAZINES? >Sample over 500 magazines in 30 categories-- all for FREE at >FreeShop.com, your source for thousands of free and trial offers! >http://click.egroups.com/1/1610/1/_/17627/_/951923134/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Steven Belknap, M.D. Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets you see, consolidate, and manage all of your finances all in one place. http://click.egroups.com/1/1636/1/_/17627/_/951928948/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com