Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 30061 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2000 21:57:50 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2000 21:57:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 25825 invoked by uid 40001); 3 Mar 2000 21:57:52 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 25822 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2000 21:57:50 -0000 Received: from hl.egroups.com (208.48.218.14) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2000 21:57:50 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2178-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2000 21:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 2984 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2000 21:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 3 Mar 2000 21:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpproxy1.mitre.org) (129.83.20.100) by mta2.onelist.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2000 21:57:46 -0000 Received: from avsrv1.mitre.org (avsrv1.mitre.org [129.83.20.58]) by smtpproxy1.mitre.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14254 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:57:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from MAILHUB2 (mailhub2.mitre.org [129.83.221.18]) by smtpsrv1.mitre.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18394 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:57:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from dhcp-104-244.mitre.org (128.29.104.244) by mailhub2.mitre.org with SMTP id 2846190; Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:57:43 EST Message-ID: <38C0361F.6D9E9580@mitre.org> Organization: The MITRE Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-19990607M (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: lojban@onelist.com References: <20000303213044.55097.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:01:03 -0500 X-eGroups-From: Carl Burke From: Carl Burke Subject: Re: [lojban] final clubs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 2037 Lines: 57 From: Carl Burke Jorge Llambias wrote: > > From: "Jorge Llambias" > > > > Definition: Every club is a final club. > > > > > > To disprove it all you have to do is find a configuration > > > where some clubs are not final and yet final clubs are > > > well defined. I don't think there is one. > > > >Suppose we have the following situation: > >Club A imposes no conditions on its members > >Club B requires members to swear a loyalty oath, > > and to swear no other oaths > >Club C requires members to swear a loyalty oath, > > and to swear no other oaths > > > >The set of final clubs is well-defined, and is composed of > >clubs B and C (the set of clubs which require loyalty oaths); > >membership in club A neither precludes nor is precluded by > >membership in clubs B or C. This doesn't help us find a > >non-recursive definition of 'final club', but it does > >illustrate that not all clubs are necessarily final. > > > >-- > >Carl Burke > > How can you tell in that example that it is B and C that > are final, and not that A is the only final club? B and C are final because they fit the recursive definition of 'final club': membership in one member of the set precludes membership in any other member of that set. The set of final clubs is a mutually exclusive set. A is not final because A does not preclude membership in any other club, and therefore does not meet the definition. (Also, the definition of 'final club' implies that there must be more than one final club so that there is something to preclude!) -- Carl Burke cburke@mitre.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERFORM CPR ON YOUR APR! Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW! http://click.egroups.com/1/2121/1/_/17627/_/952120667/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com