Received: (qmail 17766 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2000 01:38:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 19 Mar 2000 01:38:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hk.egroups.com) (10.1.10.43) by mta1.onelist.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2000 01:38:53 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: enkefalos@HOTMAIL.COM
Received: from [10.1.10.32] by hk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2000 01:38:53 -0000
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 01:38:51 -0000
To: lojban@onelist.com
Subject: Lojban as Vulcan (Was: A wide variety of comments...)
Message-ID: <8b1b3b+4b6q@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <200003180824.DAA00505@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-eGroups-From: "Arnt-Richard Johansen" <enkefalos@HOTMAIL.COM>
From: "Arnt-Richard Johansen" <enkefalos@HOTMAIL.COM>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 2273
Content-Length: 435
Lines: 15

> For the purposes of meme propogation, what do people think of the
idea
> of going through the (apparently fairly easy[1]) process of getting
a
> Paramount license and making a 'Vulcan dictionary' that is actually
> lojban?

I don't believe that would have very desirable results.  Look at
http://neptune.spaceports.com/~words/lojban.html, and especially
notice paragraph nr. 4, "Lojban is not Vulcan".

co'o mi'e tsali