From sentto-44114-2267-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Mar 18 21:21:26 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 20347 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2000 21:21:25 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2000 21:21:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7504 invoked by uid 40001); 18 Mar 2000 21:22:32 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 7500 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2000 21:22:31 -0000 Received: from ej.egroups.com (208.50.144.75) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2000 21:22:31 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2267-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.37] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Mar 2000 21:22:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17815 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2000 21:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Mar 2000 21:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.51.26) by mta1.onelist.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2000 21:22:29 -0000 Received: from default ([62.0.165.58]) by out.newmail.net ; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 23:23:41 +02:00 To: lojban@onelist.com Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20000305001006.17415.qmail@hotmail.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Message-ID: <95345062201@out.newmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 23:25:01 +0200 X-eGroups-From: "Adam Raizen" From: "Adam Raizen" Reply-To: araizen@newmail.net Subject: Re: [lojban] Sets etc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Adam Raizen" la xorxes cusku di'e > la adam cusku di'e > li'o > I think I don't have a problem with that. So you'd be > arguing that {le ralju be le'i pano mlatu} could only > be one cat, whereas {le ralju be lei pano mlatu} could > conceivably be a mass of more than one cat, it could > be {lei xa xekri} for instance. Is that right? I don't see why we have to freeze into the definition of ralju that there can be only one for a given group. It sounds like metaphysical bias to me. However "le pa ralju be le'i pano mlatu" could only be one cat, I think, whereas "le pa ralju be lei pano mlatu" could be a mass of more than one cat, in addition to possibly being the ralju of only a part of the mass, for instance the ralju of lei xa xekri. When you use a set, however, it must be the ralju of the entire set. co'o mi'e adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW! http://click.egroups.com/1/936/2/_/17627/_/953414550/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com