From sentto-44114-2250-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Tue Mar 14 23:18:45 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 14131 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2000 23:18:44 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2000 23:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 11686 invoked by uid 40001); 14 Mar 2000 23:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 11683 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2000 23:19:31 -0000 Received: from ej.egroups.com (208.50.144.75) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2000 23:19:31 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2250-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2000 23:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16117 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2000 23:19:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Mar 2000 23:19:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chalfont.mail.easynet.net) (195.40.1.44) by mta2.onelist.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2000 23:19:24 -0000 Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (tnt-5-75.easynet.co.uk [195.40.200.75]) by chalfont.mail.easynet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C101AF82CD for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=richard) by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with esmtp (Exim 2.02 #2) id 12V0a7-00004u-00 for lojban@onelist.com; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:18:31 +0000 To: lojban@onelist.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:18:31 +0000 (GMT) X-eGroups-From: Richard Curnow From: Richard Curnow Reply-To: "Richard P. Curnow" Subject: [lojban] Sumti connectives <-> sentence connectives Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Richard Curnow Given the following sentence : le nanmu e le ninmu cu citka le plise a le jbari which of the connectives 'e' and 'a' has higher 'precedence'? i.e. if this is expanded, is it equivalent to le nanmu cu citka le plise a le jbari ije le ninmu cu citka le plise a le jbari or to le nanmu e le ninmu cu citka le plise ija le nanmu e le ninmu cu citka le jbari I think if the connectives had been the same (le nanmu e le ninmu cu citka le plise e le jbari) it would make no difference. However, I don't recall coming across a discussion of what happens if the connectives are different. saurbi'o fami .isaurbi'o fado .i.ia.ua co'o mi'e ritcyd. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare Network time sync for Linux/Solaris/Dial-up at United Kingdom http://www.rrbcurnow.freeuk.com/chrony/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0% Intro APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW! http://click.egroups.com/1/975/1/_/17627/_/953075965/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com