From sentto-44114-2439-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Apr 22 07:14:00 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 29779 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 07:13:59 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 07:13:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 4168 invoked by uid 40001); 22 Apr 2000 08:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 4165 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 08:15:42 -0000 Received: from jj.egroups.com (208.50.144.82) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 08:15:42 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2439-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by jj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Apr 2000 08:15:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 11199 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 08:15:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Apr 2000 08:15:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qh.egroups.com) (10.1.2.28) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 08:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 8710 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 08:15:40 -0000 Received: from ip72.207-252-3.vastnet.net (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (207.252.3.72) by qh.egroups.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 08:15:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA23503 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:15:39 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: From: Invent Yourself MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:15:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: RE: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote: > xod: > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote: > > > > > pc: > > > > Being John Malkovitch is, presumably, le zu'u la djan malkovitc. > > > > > > I don't have any reference materials handy, but that doesn't look right. > > > > > > My effort, from feeble memory: > > > > > > le zu'u ce'u me la djan malkovitc > > > > > > The ce'u is grammatical, I think. I'm less sure whether the meaning of the > > > whole is appropriate, though. > > > > > > > > ki'a (confusion!) > > > > zu'u [ UI3 ] on the one hand > > discursive: on the one hand - on the other hand (cf. karbi, > > frica. dukti) > > > > > > ru'a do'o nitcu zo za'i > > (perhaps you meant "za'i"). > > [a curious but not inapt use of "nitcu"] > ki'e (thanks!) > I mean the NU for activity -- or rather, that's what I assumed pc was using. le su'u tcini cu smuni zo za'i (za'i = "the state of-",) .i za'a ri zmadu zo nu le ka mapti be zoi gy. being .gy (which seems to fit "being" better than the event abstraction.) > I don't have even a ma'oste on my PC here, so can't check. http://www.animal.helsinki.fi/lojban/selmaho.html ----- In the Linux world, all of the major distributions have turned into companies. How much revenue would Red Hat generate if their product was flawless? How much support would they sell? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Win $1000 at eGroups! Click here to find out how: http://click.egroups.com/1/2861/2/_/17627/_/956391341/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com