Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3467 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2000 14:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Apr 2000 14:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.www-service.de) (212.77.161.16) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2000 14:53:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1953 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2000 14:53:20 -0000 Received: from p3e9eb883.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO frilix.rus.ger.com) (62.158.184.131) by smtp.www-service.de with SMTP; 18 Apr 2000 14:53:20 -0000 Received: from kipnis (kipnis.rus.ger.com [193.27.25.34]) by frilix.rus.ger.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA01489 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: <033001bfa943$aaf2b900$22191bc1@rus.ger.com> Reply-To: "Daniel Gudlat" To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban] Sex words Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:37:48 +0200 Organization: R+S Reengineering und Softwaredesign GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-eGroups-From: "Daniel Gudlat" From: "Daniel Gudlat" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 2415 Content-Length: 4248 Lines: 119 coi doi la pycyn. cusku di'e > Lojban relationship words, Gender and relationship words -- not a record but > an appeal for polishing an area off Disclaimer: I'm far from an expert in lojban, but I'll take a stab at it. > Some words suggested, in need of definitions, explication, general tidying. > Brook Conner: > glependo - "fuck-buddy" (but no derogatory connotations [makes "fuck" a bad > choice in English -- gletu has none in Lojban, pc]) > gletu pendo In English, like in most western languages, words describing things sexual in nature either have derogatory connotations or are clinical/medical in nature. So "fuck-buddy" for a "sexual-intercourse type-of friend" is as good as anything you may possibly come up with. > pampendo - "non-sexual lover/deep friend" > prami pendo A "loving/devoted kind-of friend", a deep friend. In lojban, I would imagine this doesn't suggest sexuality, but it doesn't specifically deny it either, so strike the "non-sexual". > cinprami - "sexualove" (?lover?pc) > cinse prami I agree with pc, this would be a "sexual lover" (gismu list: x1 loves x2, not **x1 is a love...) > pamgle - loving intercourse > pamygletu - [same] > prami gletu And by the same rules, this would be a "loving intercourse-haver". I image you'd need an event abstractor to get to the suggested meanings, but then, I haven't yet started working through the lujvo making rules... > pamcinse - loving sexuality > prami cinse I agree on this one. > pedgle - friendly intercourse > pe'ogle - [same] > pe'ogletu - [same] > pedgletu - [same] > pendo gletu As a verb, yes. Again, strictly speaking this is a "friendly intercourser", or am I missing something with these tanru/lujvo? "mi pedgle do" would be "I friendly-fuck you", right? > malgle fuck1 (? as opposed how to simple copulation?pc) "derogatory intercourse", yup, this is as close to English "fuck" as it gets in lojban. As opposed to simple copulation in that it is derogatory, right? > malpe'o fuck (presumably, fuck3, since pendo has not implication of > intercourse, pc) I tentatively agree: "derogatory friend" would presumably come close to the idea of "They are fucking their paying customers" when this is uttered anywhere but inside a whore house. ;-) > gletu appears to need some clarification, given the range of activities that > these (and the following) words suggest as possibly under it (oral? anal? > digital (yes, including big toes or the athletically inclined)? "clit > bumping"? mechanical? self? -- I assume that these will make cases of > German shepherds and sheep clear). I'm German, but I know neither the shepherds nor the sheep nor their cases. Care to enlighten me? But anyway, according to the gismu list, gletu might be taken to mean only the sexual act involving the sexual organs of both sexes, as suggested by the translations "copulate, have coitus, mate, have sexual intercourse", and thus doesn't account for the wide range of sexual activities humans do for recreative purposes. (On the other hand, this narrow view would possibly leave even homosexual activity out of the picture.) Since any departure from said narrow view is really but a question of degrees, the only viable alternative seems to me to be the adoption of a wider definition that does in fact account for all of mankinds wide field of sexual activity. (Or do we really want to go down the road paved by Billyboy Clintons unfortunate lawsuit?! ;-) Once this view has been taken, the rest would become a question of building the proper tanru/lujvo: "moklu gletu" mouth-kind-of sexing, oral sex "ganxo gletu" anus-kind-of sexing, anal sex "degji gletu" finger/toe-kind-of sexing, digital sex would probably do the trick, or have I missed any pitfalls? If you actually mean vaginal-penile sex as opposed to any other way of "implementing" gletu, you then have to be accordingly specific... co'o -- Daniel "Gudy" Gudlat d.gudlat@rpluss.com No one pays me enough to speak for them, so I only speak for myself.