From sentto-44114-2673-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri May 12 08:19:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 1822 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:19:17 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10826 invoked by uid 40001); 12 May 2000 08:12:57 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 10823 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:12:56 -0000 Received: from mk.egroups.com (207.138.41.165) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:12:56 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2673-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by mk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2000 08:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 5991 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.camelot.de) (195.30.224.3) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from robin.camelot.de (uucp@robin.camelot.de [195.30.224.3]) by mail.camelot.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03877; Fri, 12 May 2000 10:12:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from oas.a2e.de (uucp@localhost) by robin.camelot.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id KAA03872; Fri, 12 May 2000 10:12:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost by wtao97 via sendmail with esmtp id for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:09:25 +0000 (/etc/localtime) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #1 built 1999-Nov-8) X-Sender: phm@wtao97.oas.a2e.de To: Elrond Cc: Lojban List In-Reply-To: Message-ID: From: PILCH Hartmut MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:09:25 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Subject: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Personally I interpret the spirit of Lojban as accepting modern > > international standards (meters & kilograms, celsius, utc time, iso dates, > > etc) unless a really good reason interferes. > I do the same. However the possible "good reasons" must be checked > carefully first. You might as well just "accept English as the international standard". Why bother about creating a neutral language roots of diverse sources? -phm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here: http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/3/_/17627/_/958119175/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com