From sentto-44114-2860-959453479-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat May 27 18:49:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 24703 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 18:49:55 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 27 May 2000 18:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 21315 invoked by uid 40001); 27 May 2000 18:51:22 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 21312 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 18:51:22 -0000 Received: from hi.egroups.com (208.50.144.89) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 27 May 2000 18:51:22 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2860-959453479-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2000 18:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 7245 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 18:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 May 2000 18:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qg.egroups.com) (10.1.2.27) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 May 2000 18:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 18846 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 18:51:19 -0000 Received: from n1.onelist.org (HELO hh.egroups.com) (10.1.10.40) by iqg.egroups.com with SMTP; 27 May 2000 18:51:19 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.94] by hh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2000 18:51:18 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Message-ID: <8gp5bi+i25b@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <392FD495.1F3C@math.bas.bg> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._T=FCting?=" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 18:49:22 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: coi rodo - mi'e .aulun. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan, > {do na finpe} vs {do na du mi} does not quite get across the > parallelism of the original, which had, I take it, something > like _ni3 bu4shi4 yu2_ vs _ni3 bu4shi4 wo3_.=20 you're right: the original is "zi3 fei1 yu2" - "zi3 fei1 wo3" (Big5: =A4l=ABD=B3=BD=A1X=A4l=ABD=A7=DA) in ancient Chinese. (You can find a graphic text=20 in 'Files'). I tried to post some remarks on writing Chinese cmene - yet failed somehow (maybe sent the message only to xorxes.) Alfred ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to table saws. http://click.egroups.com/1/4634/3/_/17627/_/959453473/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com