From sentto-44114-2863-959454757-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat May 27 19:11:12 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 24742 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 19:11:11 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 27 May 2000 19:11:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21910 invoked by uid 40001); 27 May 2000 19:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 21907 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 19:12:39 -0000 Received: from fh.egroups.com (208.50.144.71) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 27 May 2000 19:12:39 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2863-959454757-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2000 19:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 3356 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 19:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 May 2000 19:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.242) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 May 2000 19:12:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 2509 invoked by uid 0); 27 May 2000 19:12:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20000527191236.2508.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.152.86 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sat, 27 May 2000 12:12:36 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.152.86] To: lojban@egroups.com From: "Jorge Llambias" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 12:12:36 PDT Subject: Re: [lojban] coi rodo - mi'e .aulun. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit la ivAn cusku di'e >All things considered, I'd go for {tcuan,ts} and {xuei,ts}. Sounds good to me. >{do na finpe} vs {do na du mi} does not quite get across the >parallelism of the original, which had, I take it, something >like _ni3 bu4shi4 yu2_ vs _ni3 bu4shi4 wo3_. There should >be a way of making the two utterances more similar. ... {do na me mi} maybe. The lack of parallelism makes it more clear what is the flaw in the argument, which the formal parallelism of the Chinese expression perhaps helps to cloud. co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CLICK HERE***SPECIAL OFFER***$60 in FREE calls ***SPECIAL OFFER***CLICK HERE http://click.egroups.com/1/4127/3/_/17627/_/959454751/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com