From sentto-44114-2566-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sun May 07 21:32:08 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 21243 invoked from network); 7 May 2000 21:32:07 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 7 May 2000 21:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 19187 invoked by uid 40001); 7 May 2000 21:33:06 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 19184 invoked from network); 7 May 2000 21:32:46 -0000 Received: from mo.egroups.com (207.138.41.166) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 7 May 2000 21:32:46 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2566-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 07 May 2000 17:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 32235 invoked from network); 7 May 2000 17:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 7 May 2000 17:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.128) by mta1 with SMTP; 7 May 2000 17:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 375 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2000 17:07:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20000507170728.374.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.41.247.60 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2000 10:07:28 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.60] To: lojban@egroups.com From: "Jorge Llambias" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 10:07:28 PDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit la lojbab cusku di'e >It is not as if such conventions could not work; rather it is >not in the book (or any Lojban material) that way. Would a different >convention be a baseline change? Would it contradict anything in the Book? I couldn't find any mention of dates in the book. Only an example of hours:minutes:seconds. So there seems to be no baseline on that. It has to be decided by usage. If you write the date in full, it doesn't matter which convention you use, both are clear as long as you write the four digits for the year. There is obviously a demand by lojbanists for the 2000-05-07 format, which is not surprising because it is in some sense the most "logical". co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/957719259/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com