From pycyn@aol.com Mon May 08 11:18:16 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 16468 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 18:18:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 May 2000 18:18:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo19.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.9) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 May 2000 18:18:16 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v26.7.) id a.8e.4c26f57 (4316) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Mon, 8 May 2000 14:18:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <8e.4c26f57.26485edc@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:18:04 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojbanizing my (nick)name
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 33
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 2585

In a message dated 5/8/00 5:42:43 AM CST, d.gudlat@rpluss.com writes:

<< My mind keeps on suggesting "la mlatupren." as a lujvo-based name
 but I haven't yet worked through the lujvo-making rules to see if
 this is correct. Anyone? >>
It has to be {mlatypren} for a lujvo, but your form is OK for a name -- I 
think.   For the werewolf analogy, I would toss a {binxo} in between {mlatu} 
and {prenu}, but that is literalism at work again.