Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 1828 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:19:19 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 10832 invoked by uid 40001); 12 May 2000 08:12:59 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 10829 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:12:58 -0000 Received: from mk.egroups.com (207.138.41.165) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:12:58 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2674-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.37] by mk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2000 08:12:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24315 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.camelot.de) (195.30.224.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 May 2000 08:12:54 -0000 Received: from robin.camelot.de (uucp@robin.camelot.de [195.30.224.3]) by mail.camelot.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03863; Fri, 12 May 2000 10:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from oas.a2e.de (uucp@localhost) by robin.camelot.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id KAA03860; Fri, 12 May 2000 10:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost by wtao97 via sendmail with esmtp id for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:58:46 +0000 (/etc/localtime) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #1 built 1999-Nov-8) X-Sender: phm@wtao97.oas.a2e.de To: Thorild Selen Cc: lojban@egroups.com In-Reply-To: <200005120014.CAA21294@Zeke.Update.UU.SE> Message-ID: From: PILCH Hartmut MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:58:45 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Subject: [lojban] Re: 24h counting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 23 > most ought to be able to count from 0 to 23 in a > modern society. I'd like to know how common it is to use a 24-hr > format in other parts of the world; I can say that in Sweden it is > quite common, although less common in informal speech. It seems to > be quite common in Poland too, so at least we're not alone... Does > anyone have any comments on this?) In Germany it has been common for a long time, although, as you say for Sweden, more in formal than in colloquial speech. Recently it has started becoming accepted in China and Japan. It is least accepted in Hongkong, due to British influence I think. -phm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *--- FREE VOICEMAIL FOR YOUR HOME PHONE! ---* With eVoice Now you can keep in touch with clients, vendors, co-workers, friends and family ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Sign Up Today for FREE! http://click.egroups.com/1/3426/3/_/17627/_/958119175/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com