Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 2412 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 16:50:28 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 16:50:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9360 invoked by uid 40001); 12 May 2000 16:50:50 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 9357 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 16:50:49 -0000 Received: from ch.egroups.com (207.138.41.144) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 12 May 2000 16:50:49 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2694-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by ch.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2000 16:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 1327 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 16:43:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 May 2000 16:43:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bach.math.ucla.edu) (128.97.4.246) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 May 2000 16:43:14 -0000 Received: from simba.math.ucla.edu (root@simba.math.ucla.edu [128.97.4.125]) by bach.math.ucla.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA27303 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 09:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jimc@localhost) by simba.math.ucla.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00343 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 09:43:14 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: simba.math.ucla.edu: jimc owned process doing -bs To: The Lojban List In-Reply-To: <391BEEEA.4ADF@math.bas.bg> Message-ID: From: "James F. Carter" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2263 Lines: 48 On Fri, 12 May 2000, Ivan A Derzhanski wrote: > ... > Today is a day of 2000 -- to be more precise, it is a > May-ish [day of 2000] -- to be even more precise, it is > a [12th-of-the-month]-type_of a [May-ish [day of 2000]]. > Looks perfectly tanru-like to me. To me this is the most convincing analysis of the date-as-tanru so far. However, I'm still more attracted to the date as a number, specifically, a highly irregular mixed radix megadigit number. Jorge (I think it was) wrote convincingly that in most cases, and with proper care with Y2K issues, context could determine whether the year was present, so the only ambiguity was whether we were going to use the order mm,dd (my preference, and per ISO 8601) or dd,mm. Obviously, and conformant to ISO 8601, if only a single component is present it is the day. There is still the ambiguity between the date and the time, i.e. mm,dd (or dd,mm) vs. HH,MM, but none of what we're talking about can cure that problem. Speaking legally, I think we have these issues: 1. There is an applicable standard, ISO 8601. 2. It isn't being ignored, even in the USA, at least among geeks. 3. Lojban in fact lacks a baselined semantic prescription for dates. 4. The standard works in Lojban. (The mandatory hyphen separators are out; we would use pi'e I believe; but the big-end ordering will work.) 5. Therefore we ought to use it, or perhaps more strictly legal and in line with what Jorge has been writing, we ought to popularize it, and 6. The little-end ordering is literally malglico. James F. Carter Voice 310 825 2897 FAX 310 206 6673 UCLA-Mathnet; 6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095-1555 Internet: jimc@math.ucla.edu (finger for PGP key) UUCP:...!{ucsd,ames,ncar,gatech,purdue,rutgers,decvax,uunet}!math.ucla.edu!jimc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/958149795/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com