Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 13595 invoked from network); 20 May 2000 17:22:16 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 20 May 2000 17:22:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7998 invoked by uid 40001); 20 May 2000 17:23:13 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 7995 invoked from network); 20 May 2000 17:23:13 -0000 Received: from hm.egroups.com (208.50.144.92) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 20 May 2000 17:23:13 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2779-958843391-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 20 May 2000 17:23:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20152 invoked from network); 20 May 2000 17:23:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 20 May 2000 17:23:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r17.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.71) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 May 2000 17:23:11 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.33.55ab7fe (3986) for ; Sat, 20 May 2000 13:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33.55ab7fe.265823f1@aol.com> To: lojban@egroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 13:22:57 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD: emotions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 3070 Lines: 56 In a message dated 00-05-19 12:39:29 EDT, you write: << This seems related (not identical) to the performative <-> constative duality. Performative: saying it makes it true. "I now pronounce you man and wife". Constative: the speaker just wants to convey information. "Those two got married yesterday.">> Saying it in certain circumstances makes it true that they are man and wife, not makes the sentence true -- if it is a performative, then it is not a constative, and so does not make a claim (i.e., is not either true or false, though it has other kinds of successes and failures). <> Sorry; it is jsut a way of saying "says something that is either true or false" <<[Let X = author of "How to Say Things with Words", which pc recommended that I read many years ago, and which is now out of the catalog at UCLA! Hiss, boo! So I can't refresh my memory, which is bad about people.] >> X= J.L. Austin and it is _How to DO Things with Words_ <> Actually, Austin moves on to a distinction between the illucutionary force and the perlocutionary force of an utterance (related to my old "brings it about that by" predicate) what he does _in_ saying the utterance (constative, performative, .... -- a whole new list of things with new terminology) and what he succeeds in having done by all of that: assuaging his wife's anger, fear or what not, say. <> Probably not appropriate: if it works it is performative, if not it isn't. And remember that in some stranger grammars, every sentence has as its highest verb a performative defining the illocutionary force of the utterance: I hereby inform you that, I hereby decree that, .... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/958843391/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com