Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 19094 invoked from network); 24 May 2000 02:40:32 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 24 May 2000 02:40:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19814 invoked by uid 40001); 24 May 2000 02:41:44 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 19811 invoked from network); 24 May 2000 02:41:44 -0000 Received: from hk.egroups.com (208.50.144.91) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 24 May 2000 02:41:44 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2830-959136102-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by hk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 24 May 2000 02:41:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25875 invoked from network); 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo13.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.24.561dcf5 (4585) for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 22:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24.561dcf5.265c9b5b@aol.com> To: LOJBAN@egroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 22:41:31 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] le ga'irfanta Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1159 Lines: 27 In a message dated 00-05-23 16:26:52 EDT, you write: << la pycyn cusku di'e >It works for me: "the date of the end of the freeze is the result of adding >at least five years to the date of the completion of publication of ther >books" But don't ask me to lb it. le ga'irfanta fanmo detri cu sumji lo nanca be li su'omu le detri be le nu lei cukta mu'o selpaprybi'o >> Thanks! Oops! It was an illegitimate lujvo all along. Ah, well, the message was more important than its expression? I still have my worries about , but this is pretty close to regular mathematical addition anyhow -- and seems to cover the a- (even anti-)symmetric cases. Couldn't the second date given be just that of the publication of the first book, since is implicitly quantified ? The ruling involved wants (or use ). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Missing old school friends? Find them here: http://click.egroups.com/1/4055/3/_/17627/_/959136102/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com