Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 16178 invoked from network); 4 May 2000 16:34:21 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 4 May 2000 16:34:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 20388 invoked by uid 40001); 4 May 2000 16:35:05 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 20385 invoked from network); 4 May 2000 16:35:05 -0000 Received: from mu.egroups.com (207.138.41.151) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 4 May 2000 16:35:05 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2526-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2000 17:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10153 invoked from network); 4 May 2000 16:35:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 4 May 2000 16:35:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO multivac.student.cwru.edu) (129.22.239.69) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 May 2000 16:35:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 18622 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2000 16:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000504163500.18621.qmail@multivac.student.cwru.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@egroups.com To: lojban@egroups.com In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000504041620.00b43bd0@127.0.0.1> References: <4.2.2.20000503183102.00a26100@127.0.0.1> <20000503152449.68914.qmail@hotmail.com> <4.2.2.20000504041620.00b43bd0@127.0.0.1> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.5.1 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? From: Paul Jarc MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 12:35:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] coi rodo -- greetings from the newbie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 929 Lines: 22 Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) writes: > At 07:15 PM 05/03/2000 -0400, Paul Jarc wrote: > >more like English's short i [...], but lojban doesn't have an > >unambiguous way to write that sound. > > To be specific, it is one of the optional buffer sounds between consonant > pairs. As such, it is a legitimate pronunciation of "olsn". Ah, ok... I had thought the buffer sounds were allowed only between certain pairs of consonants deemed unpronounceable without a buffer. co'o mi'e pol ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *--- FREE VOICEMAIL FOR YOUR HOME PHONE! ---* With eVoice Now you can keep in touch with clients, vendors, co-workers, friends and family ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Sign Up Today for FREE! http://click.egroups.com/1/3426/2/_/17627/_/957458102/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com