Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 22124 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 11:44:52 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 8 May 2000 11:44:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 11945 invoked by uid 40001); 8 May 2000 11:45:53 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 11942 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 11:45:53 -0000 Received: from ci.egroups.com (207.138.41.176) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 8 May 2000 11:45:53 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2577-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by ci.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 May 2000 11:45:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 15539 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 11:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 May 2000 11:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO megalith.rattlesnake.com) (140.186.114.245) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 May 2000 11:45:46 -0000 Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for lojban@egroups.com; Mon, 8 May 2000 07:45:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: To: lojban@egroups.com In-reply-to: <8f62oe+a6h5@eGroups.com> (lalo@hackandroll.org) References: <8f62oe+a6h5@eGroups.com> From: "Robert J. Chassell" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 07:45:45 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Date format (Re: Lojban / Most translated Web Page) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 2397 Lines: 74 Without entering the debate over date format, let me relay my recent odd experience with date formats. I have ended up doing what I never expected. I use an Emacs Lisp function to insert the current date into a variety of documents. This turns out to be very useful. For example, here is how I keep track of changes to a shell script: # for v4.72, 2000 Apr 27 # for v4.61, 1999 Dec 29 A year and a half, or so, ago, I changed the format from=20 8 May 2000 to 2000 May 8 However, I still write dates for checks and letters in the format=20 8 May 2000 Here is what happened: I found that I have a combined visual/auditory mechanism for reading text. When I see a date written=20 8 May=20 I read it as the `Eighth of May', which takes quite a bit of time, even if I don't move my lips. :-) On the other, I read May 8 as `May Eighth'. This flows better in my head. Since I like the smooth flow of a month --> day sequence, and since I also like to know the year at which I dated something, I found I wanted a year --> month --> day sequence. When I actually read the text, I usually do not pronounce to myself the year at all; I elide it. So when I see `2000 May 8', I usually read it as `May Eighth'. Also, with an argument, the date function prints the time and day of week, like this: Mon, 2000 May 8 11:39 GMT and I like this sequence. (I use GMT, technically UTC, for time stamps since it is less confusing than local time.) On the other hand, as I said, I write addresses in letters and on checks in the day month year format. I must add that I used the day-month-year format for years (I have never like the US civilian practice of writing month-day-year); and I never expected I would change to the reverse format, but I have. Most surprising. --=20 Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ How about a flat, no-fee long distance rate of 6.7=A2 per min. -=20 or less? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you rates which=20 fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls! http://click.egroups.com/1/3820/3/_/17627/_/957786351/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com