From sentto-44114-2545-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat May 06 10:25:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 19046 invoked from network); 6 May 2000 10:25:01 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 6 May 2000 10:25:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 28191 invoked by uid 40001); 6 May 2000 10:25:54 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 28188 invoked from network); 6 May 2000 10:25:53 -0000 Received: from fh.egroups.com (208.50.144.71) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 6 May 2000 10:25:53 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2545-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2000 10:25:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7470 invoked from network); 6 May 2000 10:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 May 2000 10:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO snufflelufagas.bofh.asn.au) (139.130.48.34) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 May 2000 10:25:49 -0000 Received: from river.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by snufflelufagas.bofh.asn.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id UAA15255; Sat, 6 May 2000 20:24:02 +1000 Received: by forest.bofh.asn.au via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for lojban@egroups.com; Sat, 6 May 2000 16:46:37 +1000 (EST) To: pycyn@aol.com Cc: lojban@egroups.com References: <3a.4b5c05b.264458bd@aol.com> In-Reply-To: pycyn@aol.com's message of "Fri, 5 May 2000 13:02:53 EDT" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 From: Peter Moulder MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: 06 May 2000 16:46:37 +1000 Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit la'e cusku di'e > RECORD: date/time > Lojban, with practical ellipses in mind, rather than consistent order in a > larger-smaller dimension, records dates in DDMMYYYY order. > NOT ISO FWIW, I believe YYYYMMDD is an alternative ISO form. Compared to DDMMYYYY, it has advantages of monotonic increasing relationship between date and number interpretations (i.e. sortable), and I suspect is less likely to be misinterpreted by Americans than DDMMYYYY. co'o mi'e pijem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/957608752/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com