From sentto-44114-3152-961286304-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Jun 17 23:55:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 25524 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2000 23:55:29 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2000 23:55:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 10414 invoked by uid 40001); 17 Jun 2000 23:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 10411 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2000 23:58:25 -0000 Received: from hl.egroups.com (208.50.144.86) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2000 23:58:25 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3152-961286304-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Jun 2000 23:58:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 32047 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2000 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Jun 2000 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.236.129) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Jun 2000 23:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 59465 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jun 2000 23:58:23 -0000 Message-ID: <20000617235823.59464.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.176.48.58 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 16:58:23 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.58] To: lojban@egroups.com From: "michael helsem" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 16:58:23 PDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A defense of dead horse beating Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >From: "Jorge Llambias" li'o >There have been many comments lately about the seemingly >neverending discussions on the list about some issues. li'o .o'anai lojbo xajmi mupli pamei se mukti mi (I was only trying to introduce a little Lojbanic levity...) >I still haven't been able to figure out a comfortable way >of saying "even", as in "even the cat wants to go". li'o xu banzu fa lu le ba'e mlatu cu klama djica li'u .a lu le ba'e mlatu cu djica lenu vo'a klama li'u >It occurs to me that sometimes the le/lo distiction is >treated as if it was a gender difference: veridical and >non-veridical gender. li'o >le/lo do not correspond exactly to the/an, of course, >but fairly closely. In any case, the meaning of {zasti} >is not incorporated into the article {lo}, and of course >neither is {xanri} in {le}. tugni carmi (Yes!) ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find out your risk for Diabetes and win one of 40 cash prizes. For every test taken, we'll donate a $1 for research. http://click.egroups.com/1/5600/3/_/17627/_/961286266/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com