From sentto-44114-3295-962183187-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Wed Jun 28 10:05:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 3709 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 10:05:19 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 10:05:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 18977 invoked by uid 40001); 28 Jun 2000 09:06:31 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 18974 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 09:06:30 -0000 Received: from ef.egroups.com (207.138.41.172) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 09:06:30 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3295-962183187-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by ef.egroups.com with NNFMP; 28 Jun 2000 09:06:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 7794 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 09:06:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Jun 2000 09:06:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.33) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 09:06:27 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.6b.63781df (4540) for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 05:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6b.63781df.268b1a0f@aol.com> To: lojban@egroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 05:06:23 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Digest Number 497 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 00-06-27 17:52:05 EDT, taral writes: << On 27 Jun, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 00-06-27 16:19:15 EDT, cowan writes: > > << But "botpi" doesn't mean "bottle", the noun; it means "to bottle", the > verb. > >> > botpi bot bo'i bottle x1 is a > bottle/jar/urn/flask/closable container > for x2, made of material x3 with lid x4 1f 79 (cf. baktu, lante, > patxu, tansi, tanxe, > vasru, gacri) Well, it says "for x2", not "of x2". >> lojbab noted back toward the beginning of this thread, when the point was just about the status of container words, tht the prepositions were not significant, all were meant to amount to "containing." And how would the difference affect the noun/verb distinction? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free, Unlimited Calls Anywhere! Visit Firetalk.com - click below. http://click.egroups.com/1/5479/4/_/17627/_/962183188/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com