From pycyn@aol.com Wed Jun 28 08:31:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7559 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r12.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.66) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.42.774362e (4409) for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42.774362e.268b7439@aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:05 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Computing in lojbanistan To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3294 Sometime within the last year (since I started keeping records) someone assured us that 'lb' stood for Lojban in some ISO-long-string-of-numbers. Do these pronouncements change so rapidly? And, if so, ought we pay them any attention at all?