From sentto-44114-2959-960333775-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Tue Jun 06 23:20:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 7702 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2000 23:20:53 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2000 23:20:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 28087 invoked by uid 40001); 6 Jun 2000 23:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 28084 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2000 23:23:04 -0000 Received: from fh.egroups.com (208.50.144.71) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2000 23:23:04 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2959-960333775-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2000 23:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 5895 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2000 23:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jun 2000 23:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr) (139.179.10.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2000 23:22:52 -0000 Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (slip3.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.70.13]) by firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e56NPJC16548 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 02:25:20 +0300 (EET DST) Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR Message-ID: <393D87DE.551FAB6F@bilkent.edu.tr> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: lojban@egroups.com References: <7d.5d9eb86.266e9765@aol.com> From: Robin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 02:23:10 +0300 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Robin on cmene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit pycyn@aol.com wrote: > Well, for cmene as an abstract concept, maybe. But not for > _my_name_. That is not an arbitrary label (no matter what its > history is) but a part of my identity -- to myself and to the group in > which it is used. And, if I use several names (I regularly use four, > in fact, and a fifth for special occasions), each of them carries with > it its own aspects of my personality and interests and my special > relationships with the group in which I use it. To meddle with it is > to denigrate or ignore that part of me and so me taken as a whole. > Now, one coming into Lojban certainly can -- and does -- make a > choice about how to name oneself in that new context. If one > elects to bring over as much as possible of one's public name or > one's name from another context, then it is important that that come > out essentially correctly. The pain of some misses have been > apparent in other postings, and the urgency of getting it right -- not, > I think, only to show a mastery of lb phonology (see the worry > about a choice among several equally lb solutions). > The above may sound a bit cuckoo, but I think it is essentially the way most > people > "really" feel about their names, so I expect to have problems about cmene for > ever > hereafter. So a rose by any other name would not smell so sweet! I would say that whatever someone's cmene is, that's their name, regardless of phonology (I, for instance, get irritated by people telling me my name should be "rabin."!). With names of famous people, I suppose Alfred is right - choose the Lojnaised form that most closely fits the standard pronuciation of that language, unless we know that the person in question would have preferred a non-standard variant e.g. "Robert Burns" might come out as "rabibeirnz.". co'o mi'e robin. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/960333758/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com