From grey.havens@earthling.net Mon Jun 26 18:24:16 2000
Return-Path: <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Received: (qmail 12766 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2000 01:24:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Jun 2000 01:24:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix1.free.fr) (212.27.32.21) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2000 01:24:12 -0000
Received: from tam.n (marseille2-2-63-30.dial.proxad.net [212.27.63.30]) by postfix1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271728039 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:24:11 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:23:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: elrond@tam.n
To: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Names of characters
In-Reply-To: <0006261922130D.01794@neofelis>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006270313090.269-100000@tam.n>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3260


> " - lubu
won't "lubu" be parsed as "lu bu" (and probably make the following
ungrammatical) ? 
The jbofi'e goes crazy with the even bridi "zo lubu cu valsi".

> $ - rupnu bu
this clashes with the "Yen" and "Cent" and "Euro" symbols
why not meryru'u bu ?
and ponru'ubu and ronru'ubu for others ?

> ( - tobu
> ) - toibu
same as "lubu" ?

> @ - abubu (?)
I never thought that "@" had anything to do with "a"... At least not in
the phonological sense...
I may be wrong, but isn't there more obvious meaning of the "@" that could
be used for its name ?

co'o mi'e rafael