From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Jun 03 13:26:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1102 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2000 20:26:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 3 Jun 2000 20:26:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.195) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2000 20:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 68550 invoked by uid 0); 3 Jun 2000 20:26:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20000603202652.68549.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.154.212 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sat, 03 Jun 2000 13:26:52 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.154.212] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: First steps with 'being'... Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 13:26:52 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 2928 la aulun cusku di'e >3) ti nanmu cu na'e me mi (this man is not me), me mi=selbri (because >preceded by me) The problem here is {ti nanmu}. It means "this one is a man", and then {cu} is wrong because there is already a selbri for the sentence. {ti} is a full sumti, like {mi}. "This man" would be {le vi nanmu}. co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com