From sentto-44114-2988-960600715-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Jun 10 01:29:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 12456 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2000 01:29:31 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2000 01:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 10847 invoked by uid 40001); 10 Jun 2000 01:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 10844 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2000 01:31:56 -0000 Received: from mq.egroups.com (207.138.41.138) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2000 01:31:56 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-2988-960600715-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.38] by mq.egroups.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2000 01:31:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 5891 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2000 01:31:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 10 Jun 2000 01:31:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2000 01:31:53 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA16451 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:31:50 -0400 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.34, neofelis, , 207.15.133.34 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 21:31:51(EDT) on June 09, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] References: <8hs57o+3bcu@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <8hs57o+3bcu@eGroups.com> Message-Id: <00060921274009.00838@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:24:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Bootlegger Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la pier cusku di'e > >> So far the word is «nalkempavbivmoiga'imercmu >flake'exalpixycanja». >Is it >> correct? Should some rafsi be moved around or changed? > >You could use jikry- instead of xalpixy-, but hopefully >you're not seriously thinking of using such a word. >Why not just {jikru zercanja} or something like that? >A lujvo doesn't have to contain a definition in itself, >and a lot of what is in there seems rather unessential >to the concept anyway. It's a word in the style of German long words. It actually says more than the German (the German word doesn't mention the 18th amendment), but is shorter. phma ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITERS WANTED! Themestream allows ALL writers to publish their articles on the Web, reach thousands of interested readers, and get paid in cash for their work. Click below: http://click.egroups.com/1/3840/3/_/17627/_/960600692/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com