From sentto-44114-3118-961188296-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Fri Jun 16 20:42:10 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 23745 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2000 20:42:09 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2000 20:42:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 24408 invoked by uid 40001); 16 Jun 2000 20:45:04 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 24405 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2000 20:45:03 -0000 Received: from b05.egroups.com (207.138.41.189) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2000 20:45:03 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3118-961188296-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.36] by b05.egroups.com with NNFMP; 16 Jun 2000 20:44:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29303 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2000 20:44:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Jun 2000 20:44:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d08.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2000 20:44:52 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.3a.6926f8f (4554) for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:44:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3a.6926f8f.267bebc2@aol.com> To: lojban@egroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:44:50 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Mi za'o klama Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 00-06-16 14:37:12 EDT, xorxes writes: << If what used to be the destination is no longer the destination, then the relationship is no longer going on, and za'o does not apply. >> I think the point is that Pineville still is the *destination* but not the place he is going to end up -- at least unless he turns around. Suppose he stops off in Charlotte; his destination is still Pineville but he has stopped short of it and that is the (nearly mirror to za'o){mi co'u klama la painvil la ralix} or (more completely) {mi klama la painvil la ralix co'u la carlyt} If a person uses {za'o} in the original sentence then he is, admittedly, continuing the same relation, but that relation does not depend on where he ends up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lonely? Get Firetalk! Free, unlimited calls anywhere in the world. Free voice chat on hundreds of topics. http://click.egroups.com/1/5477/3/_/17627/_/961188261/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com