From sentto-44114-3475-963015045-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sat Jul 08 00:08:54 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 16598 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 00:08:53 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 00:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7743 invoked by uid 40001); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:48 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 7740 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:48 -0000 Received: from fh.egroups.com (208.50.144.71) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 00:10:48 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3475-963015045-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Jul 2000 00:10:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8325 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.131) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21657 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20000708001045.21656.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.154.168 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:10:44 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.154.168] To: lojban@egroups.com From: "Jorge Llambias" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:10:44 PDT Subject: RE: li [date] (was: RE: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit la and cusku di'e >Would you complain at {co'a li 2000}? I presume the reason >for you not complaining is that it is unlikely to be >misunderstood, rather than that it makes literal sense. It would make literal sense if li-numbers could be used as labels. I'm not sure that they can't, probably not. Another convention that has been used is {co'a la 2000n} = {co'a la reki'on}. (Adding -nan instead of -n is not so good because nan is the rafsi for {snanu}, which could have another meaning with numbers.) co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Missing old school friends? Find them here: http://click.egroups.com/1/5534/4/_/17627/_/963015045/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com