From sentto-44114-3371-962556533-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Sun Jul 02 16:47:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 8876 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 16:47:24 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 16:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 11954 invoked by uid 40001); 2 Jul 2000 16:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 11951 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 16:48:56 -0000 Received: from hn.egroups.com (208.50.144.84) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 16:48:56 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3371-962556533-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by hn.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 Jul 2000 16:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10725 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 16:48:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Jul 2000 16:48:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.6) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 16:48:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 53288 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 2000 16:48:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20000702164851.53287.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.32.23.66 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 02 Jul 2000 09:48:51 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.32.23.66] To: lojban@egroups.com From: "Jorge Llambias" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 09:48:51 PDT Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: opposite of za'o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit la pier cusku di'e >Well, according to jbofi'e, "fe'e nanca" isn't grammatical either. jbofi'e is correct. In any case, {fe'e nanca} is a bit strange for {lumna'a}. It is really giving a spatial setting to the nanca relationship, which is not the same as turning it into a spatial measure. A year might be different in different locations, even non-relativistically, so it does make sense to give it spatial tenses. >As to "fe'efe'e", I figured that time is real, the space dimensions are the >three imaginaries, i, j, and k, and i^2=-1, so "fe'efe'e" turns positive >time >into negative time. It does make sense mathematically, but I can't bend my mind around it linguistically... co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ High long distance bills are HISTORY! Join beMANY! http://click.egroups.com/1/4164/4/_/17627/_/962556533/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com