From phma@oltronics.net Sat Jul 01 22:21:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22787 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 05:21:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Jul 2000 05:21:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 05:21:00 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA14422 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:20:55 -0400 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.24, neofelis, , 207.15.133.24 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 01:20:55(EDT) on July 02, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: opposite of za'o Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:21:47 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain References: <20000701235735.22379.qmail@hotmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20000701235735.22379.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00070200261107.00989@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3364 On Sat, 01 Jul 2000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la pier cusku di'e > >>Since "fe'e" converts time to space, "fe'efe'e" converts time to reverse >>time. > >Fortunately :) it is not grammatical. > >>So "mi fe'efe'eza'o klama" means "I left too soon." >> >>le tarci va nu'e lo fe'e nanca be li vopici nu'u se cmene ma? > >i zo alfacentauris Well, according to jbofi'e, "fe'e nanca" isn't grammatical either. As to "fe'efe'e", I figured that time is real, the space dimensions are the three imaginaries, i, j, and k, and i^2=-1, so "fe'efe'e" turns positive time into negative time. phma