From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Jul 01 22:26:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31529 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 05:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Jul 2000 05:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (207.252.3.72) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 05:26:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA27305 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:26:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:26:37 -0400 (EDT) To: Lojban Listserver Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: opposite of za'o In-Reply-To: <00070200261107.00989@neofelis> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3365 On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Well, according to jbofi'e, "fe'e nanca" isn't grammatical either. > > As to "fe'efe'e", I figured that time is real, the space dimensions are the > three imaginaries, i, j, and k, and i^2=-1, so "fe'efe'e" turns positive time > into negative time. Yes. What a beautiful, elegant idea! If "fe'efe'e" isn't grammatical, we should find a different way to express this. ----- Wait! RSA Algorithm is coplicated, so many mathematical calculation. Please, wait for a little while or more during Decryption as your computer system.