From sentto-44114-3587-963341343-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Tue Jul 11 18:47:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: shoulson-kli@meson.org Received: (qmail 23317 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 18:47:26 -0000 Received: from zash.lupine.org (205.186.156.18) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 18:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2054 invoked by uid 40001); 11 Jul 2000 18:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: kli-mark@kli.org Received: (qmail 2049 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 18:49:11 -0000 Received: from mv.egroups.com (208.50.144.81) by zash.lupine.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 18:49:11 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-3587-963341343-mark=kli.org@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.10.35] by mv.egroups.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2000 19:49:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7970 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 18:35:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Jul 2000 18:35:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (207.252.3.72) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 18:35:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA27809 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:35:41 -0400 (EDT) To: Lojban Listserver In-Reply-To: <20.87bb743.269ca41a@aol.com> Message-ID: From: Invent Yourself MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@egroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:35:40 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] mass properties & Re: Translating names Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 00-07-11 11:01:28 EDT, & writes: > > << 1. > During the Feb/March period when Lojban-list wouldn't > send me messages, there was a discussion on properties > of masses, which I mostly missed. Did anyone make a > summary, or at least archive those messages (from > Jorge & pc in particular) that served as a de facto > summary? If no summary exists, might I suggest we > collaborate on providing one (a kind of massification > faq)? >> > > The discussion was, to put it kindly, indecisive on a number of central > points. Ihave been unable to sort it even (note: this is the minimal > requirement, the most likely thing) into a reasonable set of positions and > their arguments, let alone some agreed upon points. I am no doubt hindered Interestingly enough, it's not the most likely thing. The word "unable" acts like a negative sign, reversing the forthcoming probabilities. When it comes to what you were unable to do, we expect you were unable to handle the difficult tasks, but no, you even unable to accomplish an easy one. So once again "even" refers to the surprising. no'i However I look forward to your success! ----- Wait! RSA Algorithm is coplicated, so many mathematical calculation. Please, wait for a little while or more during Decryption as your computer system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds 3. Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR http://click.egroups.com/1/6630/4/_/17627/_/963341343/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com