From pycyn@aol.com Tue Aug 22 07:22:39 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 18583 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2000 14:22:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Aug 2000 14:22:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d05.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.37) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2000 14:22:38 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.60.63cbb3b (2615) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:22:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <60.63cbb3b.26d3e6a9@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:22:33 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] va'u
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3989

In a message dated 00-08-22 09:59:58 EDT, pi,er writes:

<< Why is the xamgu modal va'u instead of xa'u?  >>

All xVV modals are reserved for experimental use.  va'u was the closest 
available form to xamgu.