From pycyn@aol.com Wed Aug 02 06:25:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24036 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.33) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.33.846d094 (4585) for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:25:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33.846d094.26b97b50@aol.com> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:25:36 EDT Subject: RE: SW again at last To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3797 A. That the bundles are made by the mind runs into the prolem that the bundle itself -- me, for example -- feels itswlf to be a unity outside of the obserrver's mind. Of course, you could argue that that unity is in the bundle's mind, but that does already admit a unit to the bundle. B. I should have thought that the "burn" of which "fire" is the same is an activity, not a process.