From BestATN@aol.com Wed Aug 09 20:17:33 2000
Return-Path: <BestATN@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 1707 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2000 03:17:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 10 Aug 2000 03:17:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r04.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.4) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2000 03:17:32 -0000
Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.7f.8256417 (8327) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 23:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <7f.8256417.26c378c1@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 23:17:21 EDT
Subject: vim vs emacs
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 119
From: BestATN@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 3893

In a message dated 8/9/2000 06:38:11 Eastern Daylight Time, cyril slobin 
writes:
> [doi] vim
>  users, please, try to use this and send me some comments! Or all the
>  lojban people here are emacs partisans?

what is vim?  i use windows 95.  
steven