From mark@kli.org Fri Sep 01 13:38:41 2000
Return-Path: <mark@kli.org>
Received: (qmail 20156 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2000 20:38:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Sep 2000 20:38:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pi.meson.org) (209.191.39.185) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2000 20:38:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 11550 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Sep 2000 20:34:15 -0000
Date: 1 Sep 2000 20:34:15 -0000
Message-ID: <20000901203415.11549.qmail@pi.meson.org>
To: lojban@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <026201c01423$21e2daa0$22191bc1@rus.ger.com> (d.gudlat@rpluss.com)
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: vowel counts
References:  <026201c01423$21e2daa0$22191bc1@rus.ger.com>
From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4189

>Organization: R+S Reengineering und Softwaredesign GmbH
>From: "Daniel Gudlat" <d.gudlat@rpluss.com>
>Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 16:44:28 +0200
>
>
>coi rodo
>.i la jildicnen cu cusku di'e
>>
>> 'a' and 'i' win by a fair margin over the others... i wonder why that
>> is.
>
>Several possible reasons come to mind:
>
>c) Dipthongs: ai, ei, oi, and au are the lojban standard diphthongs and
>strongly favor i and a.

This last one isn't relevant, since the count was only among gismu, which
have no diphthongs.

Unless they were chosen so as to favor CVV (diphthongal) rafsi.

~mark