From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Sat Sep 23 15:51:32 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_2); 23 Sep 2000 22:51:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1491 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2000 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Sep 2000 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2000 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13612 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200009232254.SAA13612@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Get Much Ca$h ! In-Reply-To: Message from "Jorge Llambias" of "Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:02:35 GMT." Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:54:12 -0400 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4390 "Jorge Llambias" writes: >> >> >i zo oi banzu le nu jibni le seldji smuni i le nu lo lojbo >> >> >selsku cu panra lo glico selsku na nibli le nu malglico >> >>[off-list, in a hurry] >> >>Umm, Jorge, your sentence doesn't parse in jbofi'e. > >I can't find anything wrong with it. Maybe it's a bug of jbofi'e? 'lo glico selsku na nibli' is where it breaks. So, the question is, does na provide an ending for nu? Any experts wanna throw down? -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Despite not getting very emotional about it, the fact that quantum entanglement doesn't allow transmission of information is probably the most profound dissapointment I've ever experienced. -- RLPowell