Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 17282 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r02.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.2) by mta3 with SMTP; 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id a.94.9283e5b (4546) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <94.9283e5b.26e7d911@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:29:53 EDT
Subject: RE: emacs, etc.
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4267
Content-Length: 529
Lines: 12

In a message dated 00-09-06 01:28:40 EDT, pier writes:
<< mi ciska lo sampla be bau la'o gy. Forth .gy be'o poi se sazri ci'e la 
.uindoz  e la linuks.
 
 http://virtual.oltronics.net/~phma/Software/csv2html.html >>

Since I hated Forth (but ya use what ya got), I am less than cheered by this 
news; I'd hate for it to be the exception to prove the rule or the future 
universal language.  But, on the other hand, if someone else is writing it 
....  So can someone write a useful Lojban-directed program in Forth?