Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7619 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2000 17:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2000 17:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.113.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2000 17:22:26 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id B658C26333; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 12:22:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 12:22:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] samselpla vs. samjva To: phma@oltronics.net Cc: lojban@egroups.com In-Reply-To: <00090208210400.00887@neofelis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-1804289383-967915344=:20635" Message-Id: <20000902172224.B658C26333@mail.taral.net> From: Taral X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 4207 Content-Length: 894 Lines: 26 --8323328-1804289383-967915344=:20635 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii On 2 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>Since lujvo aren't standardized, I'd like to suggest a change from >>"samselpla" to "samjva". I tend to view "samselpla" (computer type-of >>plan) as "computer architecture", whereas "samjva" (computer type-of >>rule(s)) really echoes my idea of what a "computer program" is. > How about "seltibyste" (list of commands)? I would agree, but "program" is more than "commands". "seltibyste" seems to be more "computer script" than "computer program". Consider a Haskell program. That's certainly not a list of commands... -- Taral Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. --8323328-1804289383-967915344=:20635 Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature [Attachment content not displayed.] --8323328-1804289383-967915344=:20635--